Helpful information about family law (divorce, custody, property division, child support, maintenance, relocation, adoption) and estate planning (wills, Community Property Agreements, Durable Power of Attorney, probate, etc.) from Peter Mogren, an attorney from the Renton Washington law firm established in 1942. We service the greater Seattle area, including Bellevue, Federal Way, SeaTac, Burien, Mercer Island and Kent.
Monday, March 29, 2010
Fastest Old Man in Ballard
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Death and the Law

The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at http://mgrlaw.com/legalarticle/Wills-and-Probate-Information.html for more information.
Friday, March 19, 2010
Criteria for Shared Joint Custody in Washington

"(b) Where the limitations of RCW 26.09.191 are not dispositive, the court may order that a child frequently alternate his or her residence between the households of the parents for brief and substantially equal intervals of time if such provision is in the best interests of the child. In determining whether such an arrangement is in the best interests of the child, the court may consider the parties geographic proximity to the extent necessary to ensure the ability to share performance of the parenting functions."
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at Washington Divorce Procedures for more information.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Criteria for a Permenant Parenting Plan Residential Schedule

(3) RESIDENTIAL PROVISIONS.
(a) The court shall make residential provisions for each child which encourage each parent to maintain a loving, stable, and nurturing relationship with the child, consistent with the child's developmental level and the family's social and economic circumstances. The child's residential schedule shall be consistent with RCW 26.09.191. Where the limitations of RCW 26.09.191 are not dispositive of the child's residential schedule, the court shall consider the following factors:
(i) The relative strength, nature, and stability of the child's relationship with each parent;
(ii) The agreements of the parties, provided they were entered into knowingly and voluntarily;
(iii) Each parent's past and potential for future performance of parenting functions as defined in *RCW 26.09.004(3), including whether a parent has taken greater responsibility for performing parenting functions relating to the daily needs of the child;
(iv) The emotional needs and developmental level of the child;
(v) The child's relationship with siblings and with other significant adults, as well as the child's involvement with his or her physical surroundings, school, or other significant activities;
(vi) The wishes of the parents and the wishes of a child who is sufficiently mature to express reasoned and independent preferences as to his or her residential schedule; and
(vii) Each parent's employment schedule, and shall make accommodations consistent with those schedules.
Factor (i) shall be given the greatest weight.
(b) Where the limitations of RCW 26.09.191 are not dispositive, the court may order that a child frequently alternate his or her residence between the households of the parents for brief and substantially equal intervals of time if such provision is in the best interests of the child. In determining whether such an arrangement is in the best interests of the child, the court may consider the parties geographic proximity to the extent necessary to ensure the ability to share performance of the parenting functions.
(c) For any child, residential provisions may contain any reasonable terms or conditions that facilitate the orderly and meaningful exercise of residential time by a parent, including but not limited to requirements of reasonable notice when residential time will not occur.
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at http://mgrlaw.com/legalarticle/Family-Law-Information.html for more information.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Criteria for Determining a Temporary Parenting Plan

RCW 26.09.197 Issuance of temporary parenting plan — Criteria.
After considering the affidavit required by RCW 26.09.194(1) and other relevant evidence presented, the court shall make a temporary parenting plan that is in the best interest of the child. In making this determination, the court shall give particular consideration to:
(1) The relative strength, nature, and stability of the child's relationship with each parent; and
(2) Which parenting arrangements will cause the least disruption to the child's emotional stability while the action is pending.
The court shall also consider the factors used to determine residential provisions in the permanent parenting plan.
The court is relatively conservative, tending to preserve the status quo as much as possible. That tends to mean that the pattern the parties have voluntarily set up in the past, is likely to be a guide for the court to use in setting the residential schedule for the future, unless there is a reason for doing things differently.
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Washington Prenuptial Agreements

In general, a Washington Prenuptial Agreement is more likely to be enforced by a court if the contract is fair and if both parties are honest and clear about their finances, including income, assets (including values), and liabilities. Sometimes a couple will not follow the agreement while they are married, and this can make the agreement unenforceable.
Prenuptial Agreements are very complicated and are often not enforced by a court if they are not carefully written. Attorneys can help make an agreement more enforceable. It is a good idea for both parties to have independent legal advice (meaning each of you have different attorneys) and help in drafting the contract.
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, including prenuptial agreements. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at http://mgrlaw.com/SiteMap.html for more information.
Monday, March 15, 2010
Page Limits in King County Family Law Motions

The moving party is limited to a total of 25 pages, and that applies to the total of the documents submitted, including any reply (so don't use up all your pages initially, save some for reply). The responding party is limited to a total of 20 pages. In counting the pages, you do not include any Exhibits, the Financial Declaration, or any expert reports or evaluations. If you submit more pages than allowed, you risk the court stop reading anything beyond the page limit, the court continuing the hearing and making you submit documents within the page limits, or other sanctions by the court.
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at King County Divorce Procedure for more information.
Friday, March 12, 2010
How to Stop a Washington Divorce in Progress

The procedure we go through to stop the legal action depends upon where we are in the process. If the other party has not appeared in the action or filed a Response, we can unilaterally dismiss the action with a Voluntary Non Suit. If the other party has appeared and filed a Response, then the petitioning party cannot just unilaterally dismiss the action. It will take the agreement of the parties to dismiss, by filing an Agreed Order of Voluntary Dismissal.
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at Federal Way Divorce Information for more information.
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Confirmation of Issues in King County Washington Divorce

The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at Kent Divorce Attorneys for more information.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Motion for Default

If no Response has been filed, the moving party (petitioner) can file a Motion for Default, defaulting the responding party (respondent) out of the lawsuit. If that happens, the petitioner can go to court and get everything they have asked for in their Petition (although they cannot exceed what they have asked for). In a Dissolution of Marriage, there is still the 90 day waiting period in Washington that must expire before you can enter the final Decree of Dissolution to dissolve the marriage. To avoid the default from being entered, the respondent must file the Response.
If the respondent has not appeared in the action in any fashion (phone call, letter, signature or formal papers, etc.), then the petitioner can file the Motion for Default without even giving the respondent any notice. If the respondent has appeared in the action, then the petitioner must give them notice of the Motion for Default, so that they have an opportunity to respond.
If you have been served with a Summons and Petition, make sure you put in a timely Response to Petition. If you are the Petitioner and the respondent has not filed a Response, you can file a Motion for Default and enter a Decree along the lines of your Petition, without having to wait for your trial date.
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at Seattle Divorce Law Firm for more information.
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
How Much Does a Divorce Attorney Cost?

Most attorneys in family law cases charge by the hour for their time. The hourly rate the attorney charges typically depends upon their experience. The attorney who charges the lowest rate may not be as proficient or knowledgeable, and therefore not the least expensive to you.
Most attorneys will charge an advanced fee deposit to be paid up front. This deposit should go into the attorney's trust account, meaning it is your funds, not the attorney's. The attorney should send out a monthly bill, summarizing the costs incurred and attorney fees used on your case. Those costs will then be deducted from the trust account. In many cases, you will be requested to replenish the trust account to maintain a minimum balance for future work.
The amount the attorney requests to be placed in the trust account will usually depend upon his/her evaluation of the case. The simpler the case frequently the less required. The more difficult the case frequently the more required. More complicated cases typically require more work, necessitating the larger balance. Frequently we break it down depending upon whether 1) all issues are agreed upon, 2) some issues are not agreed upon, or 3) whether an order to show cause is necessary for the entry of immediate temporary orders. Other issues that can affect it are whether there are children (requiring a Parenting Plan and Order of Child Support), or complicated property issues (separate property, retirement benefits, etc.).
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at Washington Family Law Help for more information.