Monday, March 29, 2010
Fastest Old Man in Ballard
This last weekend I ran in the Ballard Sons of Norway Leif to Leif 5K fun run. The race ran from the Leif Erikson statue in Ballard out to the Leif Erikson statue at Shilshole Bay, and then back again. It was a fun event, including free heart waffles after the race, and various Norwegian activities (including tasting 5 different jars of pickled herring). When the race was over and they handed out the awards, I received a first place blue ribbon in the 51 to 76 year old age category (my first blue ribbon). I think that means that I was the fastest "old man" in Ballard last Saturday.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Death and the Law

I recently had a client come in to have a Will, Durable Power of Attorney and Health Care Directive prepared. He just found out he had cancer, and was given only about a month to live. To say the least, he was in a state of shock. As a lawyer, I am prepared to prepare the proper legal documents for him, but the important issues of life and death, are outside of my legal training.
In talking with him, I had to admit that I could not relate to what he was going through, and could offer him no answers to the questions like why me. The one thing I could offer him was the one thing that gives me comfort and confidence in this life, and in the life to come. That is the assurance of my salvation though faith in Jesus Christ. I shared that I have the confidence in going to heaven after my death, not due to who I am or what I have done, but simply because Jesus lived the perfect life that I should be living (but can't as hard as I try), and died the tragic death that I deserve to have (because of the sinful life I have lived). By putting my faith in Him, believing that He died to pay the penalty of my sin, I am now in right standing with God, and can therefore be in His perfect presence. His resurrection from the dead, can assure me of my life with Him after death.
The loss and sorrow of death is real, but it is extremely comforting to know that one can go to a better place. Please contact me if your are interested in more information about this, or read the following short track: Where Will You Spend Eternity
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at http://mgrlaw.com/legalarticle/Wills-and-Probate-Information.html for more information.
Friday, March 19, 2010
Criteria for Shared Joint Custody in Washington

When the parties separate during a divorce and there are children, the determination of a Permanent Parenting Plan can often be one of the biggest issues to resolve. Frequently the the issue of shared or joint custody/residential time (joint custody) comes up. Historically that concept has been disfavored by the legislature and the courts. The old statute prohibited the court from doing this unless the parties agreed to this arrangement. The Washington legislature amended the statute in 2007, eliminating the requirement for the parties to agree to this. Currently, the statute, RCW 26.09.187(3)(b) sets out the criteria for establishing a shared residential schedule in a Permanent Parenting Plan as follows:
"(b) Where the limitations of RCW 26.09.191 are not dispositive, the court may order that a child frequently alternate his or her residence between the households of the parents for brief and substantially equal intervals of time if such provision is in the best interests of the child. In determining whether such an arrangement is in the best interests of the child, the court may consider the parties geographic proximity to the extent necessary to ensure the ability to share performance of the parenting functions."
In reality, the courts are still reluctant to award this type of arrangement, but the door has been opened, and with time the courts will be more receptive.
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at Washington Divorce Procedures for more information.
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at Washington Divorce Procedures for more information.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Criteria for a Permenant Parenting Plan Residential Schedule

When the parties separate during a divorce and there are children, the determination of a Permanent Parenting Plan can often be one of the biggest issues to resolve. The Washington statute, RCW 26.09.187 sets out the criteria for establishing the residential schedule for a Permanent Parenting Plan as follows:
(3) RESIDENTIAL PROVISIONS.
(a) The court shall make residential provisions for each child which encourage each parent to maintain a loving, stable, and nurturing relationship with the child, consistent with the child's developmental level and the family's social and economic circumstances. The child's residential schedule shall be consistent with RCW 26.09.191. Where the limitations of RCW 26.09.191 are not dispositive of the child's residential schedule, the court shall consider the following factors:
(i) The relative strength, nature, and stability of the child's relationship with each parent;
(ii) The agreements of the parties, provided they were entered into knowingly and voluntarily;
(iii) Each parent's past and potential for future performance of parenting functions as defined in *RCW 26.09.004(3), including whether a parent has taken greater responsibility for performing parenting functions relating to the daily needs of the child;
(iv) The emotional needs and developmental level of the child;
(v) The child's relationship with siblings and with other significant adults, as well as the child's involvement with his or her physical surroundings, school, or other significant activities;
(vi) The wishes of the parents and the wishes of a child who is sufficiently mature to express reasoned and independent preferences as to his or her residential schedule; and
(vii) Each parent's employment schedule, and shall make accommodations consistent with those schedules.
Factor (i) shall be given the greatest weight.
(b) Where the limitations of RCW 26.09.191 are not dispositive, the court may order that a child frequently alternate his or her residence between the households of the parents for brief and substantially equal intervals of time if such provision is in the best interests of the child. In determining whether such an arrangement is in the best interests of the child, the court may consider the parties geographic proximity to the extent necessary to ensure the ability to share performance of the parenting functions.
(c) For any child, residential provisions may contain any reasonable terms or conditions that facilitate the orderly and meaningful exercise of residential time by a parent, including but not limited to requirements of reasonable notice when residential time will not occur.
At trial, the Court will examine each of these factors to determine what is the best interest of the child(ren), and establish the Permanent Parenting Plan.
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at http://mgrlaw.com/legalarticle/Family-Law-Information.html for more information.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Criteria for Determining a Temporary Parenting Plan

When the parties separate during a divorce, and cannot agree on what the residential schedule should be for the minor children, it is not uncommon for either party to file a motion in Family Court, to establish a Temporary Parenting Plan. The Washington statute, RCW 26.09.197, sets out the criteria for establishing the residential schedule for a Temporary Parenting Plan as follows:
RCW 26.09.197 Issuance of temporary parenting plan — Criteria.
After considering the affidavit required by RCW 26.09.194(1) and other relevant evidence presented, the court shall make a temporary parenting plan that is in the best interest of the child. In making this determination, the court shall give particular consideration to:
(1) The relative strength, nature, and stability of the child's relationship with each parent; and
(2) Which parenting arrangements will cause the least disruption to the child's emotional stability while the action is pending.
The court shall also consider the factors used to determine residential provisions in the permanent parenting plan.
The court is relatively conservative, tending to preserve the status quo as much as possible. That tends to mean that the pattern the parties have voluntarily set up in the past, is likely to be a guide for the court to use in setting the residential schedule for the future, unless there is a reason for doing things differently.
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at King County Divorce Lawer for more information.
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Washington Prenuptial Agreements

A Prenuptial Agreement is a contract entered into by two people before their marriage. They redefine the laws of the State of Washington and how it applies to their specific marriage. They often decide how property will be divided if they get a divorce, legal separation, annulment, of when one of them dies. Some couple wait until after they are married to make these agreements, then the contract is a marital agreement.
In general, a Washington Prenuptial Agreement is more likely to be enforced by a court if the contract is fair and if both parties are honest and clear about their finances, including income, assets (including values), and liabilities. Sometimes a couple will not follow the agreement while they are married, and this can make the agreement unenforceable.
Prenuptial Agreements are very complicated and are often not enforced by a court if they are not carefully written. Attorneys can help make an agreement more enforceable. It is a good idea for both parties to have independent legal advice (meaning each of you have different attorneys) and help in drafting the contract.
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, including prenuptial agreements. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at http://mgrlaw.com/SiteMap.html for more information.
In general, a Washington Prenuptial Agreement is more likely to be enforced by a court if the contract is fair and if both parties are honest and clear about their finances, including income, assets (including values), and liabilities. Sometimes a couple will not follow the agreement while they are married, and this can make the agreement unenforceable.
Prenuptial Agreements are very complicated and are often not enforced by a court if they are not carefully written. Attorneys can help make an agreement more enforceable. It is a good idea for both parties to have independent legal advice (meaning each of you have different attorneys) and help in drafting the contract.
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, including prenuptial agreements. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at http://mgrlaw.com/SiteMap.html for more information.
Monday, March 15, 2010
Page Limits in King County Family Law Motions

Are your aware that there are limits to the number of pages you can file in a motion for a family law hearing in King County, Washington? Well there is, and it has been in effect for a couple years. The reason for this is that the court has to read the paperwork for numerous hearings, and the volume of reading was becoming burdensome.
The moving party is limited to a total of 25 pages, and that applies to the total of the documents submitted, including any reply (so don't use up all your pages initially, save some for reply). The responding party is limited to a total of 20 pages. In counting the pages, you do not include any Exhibits, the Financial Declaration, or any expert reports or evaluations. If you submit more pages than allowed, you risk the court stop reading anything beyond the page limit, the court continuing the hearing and making you submit documents within the page limits, or other sanctions by the court.
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at King County Divorce Procedure for more information.
The moving party is limited to a total of 25 pages, and that applies to the total of the documents submitted, including any reply (so don't use up all your pages initially, save some for reply). The responding party is limited to a total of 20 pages. In counting the pages, you do not include any Exhibits, the Financial Declaration, or any expert reports or evaluations. If you submit more pages than allowed, you risk the court stop reading anything beyond the page limit, the court continuing the hearing and making you submit documents within the page limits, or other sanctions by the court.
The Renton law firm of Mogren, Glessner & Roti, represents clients in a variety of family law cases, both contested and uncontested. We have 4 attorneys for you to chose from. Please visit our web page at King County Divorce Procedure for more information.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
